Solutions should have web and user interfaces that provide accessibility to Ontarians with disabilities; and comply with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA).

Stand-alone solutions should demonstrate seamless integration, which should include elements such as;

• Single sign-on with PoS login credentials
• Receiving patient context (identification) information from PoS systems
• Automatically sending clinical information to PoS patient records as discreet data
• Sending virtual visit notifications to the PoS
• Calendar information

Solutions should not automatically trigger claims submission for all completed virtual visits.

Solutions can assist clinicians to identify virtual visits that are eligible for claims (e.g., offering a “billable” vs “nonbillable” flag).

Automated OHIP verification can assist clinicians from a claims and medico-legal perspective. It can also make patient registration processes more efficient.

Solutions should verify that the 10-digit OHIP number format is valid.

Solutions can also:

• Verify that number is associated with the patient by matching with registration details
• Verify that the patient’s OHIP number is valid through MOHLTC Health Card Validation (HCV)

Clinicians should authenticate using more than one piece of evidence to access the solution (2FA).

Examples:

• FOB + PIN
• Password + Security question
• Password + Authentication app
• Authenticator + SMS/Phone call

An audio visit may be an acceptable alternative if insufficient bandwidth is available to support a video visit.

Solutions should allow different audio and video sources to be used during an event. For example, the clinician could use a standard webcam and a hand-held exam camera in the same event.

Solutions will allow patients and caregivers to perform equipment (i.e., audio and/or video) and connectivity tests (i.e., Wi-Fi) and send reports to clinics prior to virtual visits.

Clinician experience and efficiency can be improved by creating separate inboxes (groups) for administrative versus clinical messages.

Solutions should allow other care team members to join in a secure messaging visit. This can include reading or creating messages.

Physicians participating in the provincial pilot identified the ability to flag patient messages for review as important for triaging and care team collaboration purposes.

Physicians participating in the provincial pilot identified this feature as important in order to confirm that medical advice has been received before a visit can be completed.

Area of Practice.

IP Address.

Participant's name, date of birth, gender, and unique identifier i.e., Health card number